Baseless Malware Accusations Don't Hold Value

A common question we receive is whether our software is safe. The answer is yes! Let's quickly lay out the facts:

• JJSploit, when downloaded from wearedevs.net, is not malicious and developed by us.
• Your antivirus flags it because it changes how other programs on your system work,
• All Roblox exploits behave in similar ways; they modify process memory and behavior.
• Any other website offering JJSploit downloads is not controlled by us and may be malicious.

We've dealt with a lot of confrontation on the subject of JJSploit being malicious, but no one could satisfy the burden of proof other than an antivirus scan, which is not enough evidence to prove if an exploit is truly malicious.

Most of the time, this confusion originates from inexperienced users jumping to conclusions, but if you genuinely find something malicious on WeAreDevs, report it to us with file hashes and static/behavioral analysis (e.g., screenshots of malicious code, Procmon and Wireshark logs).

Technical Explanation Behind False Positives

Your computer's memory (RAM) stores data your computer needs to access quickly, like scripts, instances, or other programs. Roblox exploits fundamentally have to modify Roblox's memory so they can hook into the scripting engine. Memory editing can look suspicious to an antivirus because malware sometimes uses it as a cloaking technique, but just because an exploit interacts with Roblox only doesn’t mean it’s harmful.

Antiviruses often flag exploits just to be safe. If heuristics triggered the alert, that’s called a false positive. These happen all the time, especially with cheats. And if it’s tagged "GameHack," the name says it all: it’s a Roblox exploit. Full stop.

Determining if an Exploit is Undeniably Malicious

I’ve personally reviewed JJSploit and found no malicious behavior, but I cannot say the same for every program on WeAreDevs. To determine if an exploit is truly malicious, you need to go full detective mode. Simple antivirus scans aren’t enough because they're inaccurate as hell. The following paragraphs will explain some tools and approaches that can help.

Start by monitoring network activity using tools like Wireshark or MITMProxy. Look for unexplained, long-lived TCP connections, which could indicate a remote access trojan (RAT). You'll need to do further analysis to determine if that socket is being used for legitimate purposes, such as a websocket for notifications.

Next, track system activity with Procmon to see what files, registry keys, and system internals the program interacts with.

For deeper inspection, you can use disassemblers or decompilers like IDA Pro, Ghidra, Binary Ninja, or any dissassembler/decompiler of your choice. These tools let you reconstruct the program into human-readable code to understand its behavior.

If this process seems too complex or overwhelming, I'd recommend trusting the professionals who have experience with malware analysis, not your friends.

Conclusion

• Official JJSploit is safe. When downloaded from the official source, it is not malicious.
• Unofficial downloads are risky. Any JJSploit offered on other websites could be malicious.
• Antivirus scans alone aren’t proof. Alerts don’t automatically indicate malware; deeper analysis is needed for certainty.
• Investigate responsibly. Malware analysis tools can help if you want to confirm a program’s behavior.