Forum > General >

Is it possible to get rid of the WRD Watermarks?

inevitable

Posts: 120

Threads: 19

Joined: Apr, 2018

Reputation: 1

Posted

When using the WeAreDevs api and adding an inject button, when you use the inject it pops up 2 watermarks, first it goes to the website and then a textbox appears saying to see more exploits like this or whatever check out the website. Of course I understand the purpose for them, it's so people don't take credit for it, but is there a way to get rid of them? I'm not trying to take credit for this, I'm just trying to get rid of it because it's annoying, and of course I'd add WRD to credits if I can delete the watermarks.

  • 0

WRD

Owner

admin

Posts: 990

Threads: 33

Joined: Dec, 2016

Reputation: 106

Replied

I’m planning on setting it so that Junior members can get rid of the watermark for their releases. May follow a different route though

  • 1

I'm just a chill guy fr 🤙

inevitable

Posts: 120

Threads: 19

Joined: Apr, 2018

Reputation: 1

Replied

Trying to be reasonable, it costs $5 for Junior, some people don't have money period, or a way to give money, and $5 to get rid of watermarks? I think there should be an alternative and make it simple, like a form saying they won't take credit and proof they give credit to WRD. Even if Junior does come with other things, if you look at it, most of the people on roblox now a days are kids. If you're going to make roblox exploits you should at least know the audience you're performing for.

  • 0

Trivlax

Posts: 6

Threads: 3

Joined: Jan, 2018

Reputation: 0

Replied

Hmmmm.... lets take a moment and think if you literally just leave it free and accessible to anyone to use it is very easy to create a whitelist for that. And with the growing power of the API you will be seeing people selling the WRD api exploits without the watermark. 

Sooo I believe watermark should stay ;P

  • 0

Stevie

red

Posts: 401

Threads: 27

Joined: Jan, 2018

Reputation: 14

Replied

I find the watermark very reasonable I see the website popping up could be irritating, but it wouldn't make sense to take these things out, being free it should have a watermark like MOST things do. Ranging from Just Images to programs. And with what Jon said about Junior not having Watermark popups, I find that very reasonable. Its not like your paying 5$ ONLY for that watermark to be removed, your paying for multiple perks. 

  • 0

inevitable

Posts: 120

Threads: 19

Joined: Apr, 2018

Reputation: 1

Replied

I'm not saying take away watermarks period. I'm saying there needs to be an alternative than $5 in my opinion. I'm aware Junior comes with other things, but I mean $5 for Junior, just to get a premium exploit, when you can make your own and replace the premium exploit? Change username? that isn't really a big deal when you can make new accounts, and having the global chat role doesn't even matter at this point because 1: there's no global chat, and 2: even when it comes back if it does it doesn't prove superiority or anything it's legit a role saying "you spent $5," and no ads? There's something called ad blocker. So if you add the watermark option to Junior you're saying pay $5 for all these bullshit-simple solution accessories that not everyone has and then the watermark option. I'm not trynna call this all bullshit and start some rant or whatever. I'm just saying, there should be an alternative. I'm aware people will try to sell it if there's a way to get rid of the watermark. When I say alternative, I say making some sort of form someone must agree to, and adding credits to it. Of course there can be flaws in this but there are alternatives for everything. But one of the alternatives I can't find is having no watermark on an exploit. I don't want to take credit for anything or sell anything, honestly I'm not interested in money it's more of a hobby than that.

  • 0

Shampipple

Posts: 92

Threads: 17

Joined: Mar, 2018

Reputation: 0

Replied

Ok, today kids we learn to put a tab before our paragraphs.

  • 0

vIYoung

Posts: 29

Threads: 5

Joined: Mar, 2018

Reputation: 0

Replied

In my opinion i think watermarks should stay, But there should be a alternative like you have to agree to it and then you can get the API that has No watermark i understand people will try to sell it because API is getting bigger and sooner or later it will have a full LUA but i think its pretty dumb to have a watermark plus it annoys the shit out of me it takes like 5 seconds then it should be to load up a damn exploit.
If there is anyway i bet half the WEAREDEV'S Community wont even try to sell it reason why i think that is because half of this community is most likely 12 year olds and yea. But i think watermarks should stay but if you agree to something and you get accepted you have a complete hole new tab with the API with no watermark like 5$ to pay for something completely dumb that you can easily bypass and thats not even stand out to on another. Maybe if you can do that JJ it would be great for most of us so we dont have to worry about that damn watermark and in general if i even tried selling it i would put like "Thanks to WEAREDEVS for making this possible"

  • 0

inevitable

Posts: 120

Threads: 19

Joined: Apr, 2018

Reputation: 1

Replied

I completely agree with vIYoung

  • 0

Vader

vip

Posts: 3824

Threads: 191

Joined: Mar, 2018

Reputation: 67

Replied

some how this site has to be support in some way.

So water marks, 5 bucks to remove it, or no more api if no support.

  • 0

Reputation Goal: 69
#NoMoreMods

 

#MEWANTGLOBALCHAT 

Users viewing this thread:

( Members: 0, Guests: 1, Total: 1 )