Exploits and Byfron

Byfron is obviously gonna break exploits a lot and it will surely take Developers to fix / update it. However, I believe the community is good enough to bypass it, as always. Although I don't know much about Reverse Engineering / C++, I believe it's hard enough to bypass it and pretty much make it work.

As for paid exploits, in my opinion it's worth it. If you can't afford 8.50$ for Synapse, honestly just get a job. That's my opinion.

Why are people being so dramatic lol

The community won't just suddenly die + it's not an anti cheat it's an anti tamper which I guess is to prevent cheats but still

@VoidableMethod

There are some things in life that $8 a month is worth. A Roblox exploit is not one of them. Plus I'm sure you know as well as I do that a large portion of this community is underage for getting a job. And even with a job, again, there are much more important things to spend money on besides a Roblox exploit. So yeah, $8 a month for a Roblox exploit is kinda more than people will be willing to pay.

... I respect your opinion though btw

@87922
I think cheating in games in gta v are fun and a good learning experience

@Alternate
Same personally I ain't finna pay monthly for any exploit for any game lol 

honestly, when byfron comes out, i will quit roblox exploiting unless there will still be a way to make a free exploit.

there is still gonna be free exploits its not the "greatest" anti cheat ever looking at the games it is in and i think i will stick to roblox

@68729 it's simple to switch to malbolge and enter this in every code --> #include <stdio.h>

main(t,_,a)
char *a;
{
return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86,0,a+1)+a)):
1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a):3,main(-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?
main(2,_+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,
"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#l+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#\
;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l \
q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]'/+#n';d}rw' i;#\
){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n'wk nw' \
iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c \
;;{nl'-{}rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# \
}'+}##(!!/")
:t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1)
:0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,
"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);

@Kxhu If you just use api's I guess you're leaving, Cause I think there wont be any PublicAPIs that you can just reference and use it for your own exploit.

If your good at UI with wpf or winforms you could contact and colab with the exploit's developer. All though I don't think you can use a PublicAPI. You could ask permission to use someone elses dll for your own exploit.

If you aren't willing to do any of this you could take courses on Reverse Engineering and cpp.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzoW4oD4PeY&t=73s