SirHurt | Cheap ROBUX A/T & Script Executor | Lifetime 10$ | Service since 2015

I love wearing lego exploit merchandise 

Let hell begin

the exploit is not powerfull, free ones are better , its not as good as its used to be

Sirhurt is a dependable and stable exploit as of currently with a few bugs that could still be ironed out but all in all its worth the price.

Don't mind the above posts, as always, the same people use the same old, outdated, irrelevant things that happened years ago as a modern day reason as to not obtain the product. Would be nice if people would stop living in 2019 and would start getting there heads in 2022. Sad reality is most of the 'reasoning' people give as to not obtaining SirHurt has absolutely nothing to do with the actual cheat / exploit in itself. I appreciate the bumps, though!

@pierre_spook If the exploit is worth the price, can u explain on why alot of scripts dont work on sirhurt that work fine even on jjsploit.

Sirhurt ain't worth the 10 bucks. It's like trying to buy temple cause temple ain't even worth it. Free exploits like oxygen u fluxus krnl can all do the same thing but better. Sirhurt isn't just the pinnacle of being clown exploit the owner themselve are also a p e d o . Which is a big red flag itself considering that kids buy these kind of products. 

@GoldenCheats SirHurt can run plenty of scripts and plenty of users use it on a daily basis. When purchasing a product you aren't just paying for the script execution which is something people really don't take into consideration anymore when considering a product.

Edit: To note, I likely won't respond to most 'hate' posts on this thread because of two reasons; one, I could frankly care less as my direct messages have always been open to bug reports and nobody here posting 'it sucks' is making any active attempt at getting there problems fixed, and two, the posts are the same old reasons as I've explained away 100s of times before anyway. Users can always dig through my previous threads as I've answered away these same concerns plenty of times. A great example is the good old 'pierre is a pedo' claim. Easily debunked plenty of times, along with that old database leak and anyone who still carries that 'p word' bias couldn't spot a pedo if they tried and use as a 'power word' in an attempt to win the argument because they have nothing relevant to actually speak. Come on people for real, the p-word drama happened around 2-3 years ago and theres still plenty of people who purchase SirHurt daily, reccomend it daily, and use it daily. If posting 'ice is a p word' was going to have an actual effect at killing the product it would of done so already and we wouldn't still be here right now fighting about it. it didn't stop people buying SirHurt the first time, so why is it going to suddenly make a difference here the 10000th time?

@pierre_spook "Hate post" Im literaly a user of sirhurt who has to suffer running owl hub on a 10$ exploit because the esp is partically broken (arsenal)

@pierre_spook never been debunked you just gave your side of the story and quite frankly it's not even a good one 

@Hiroku My side of the story stands true, and like stated, you don't even know what a pedophile is otherwise we wouldn't be here discussing it unless you are actually that desperate at trying to stop SirHurt sales. Clorox was 16, I was 19, the offical definition of pedophilia states that the disorder is diangosed for those who have a 5 year of higher age gap, or the person in question (in this case clorox) is 13 years or younger. Do the math and you very much have your answer on whether or not I meet that catagory.

There is nothing wrong with online relationships, and just because someone has one doesn't automatically mean they qualify as a pedophile. The sad thing is none of you even took my age or the parties age in question and never have otherwise we wouldn't be here talking about it now would we? There's a difference between 'wrong' and 'pedophilia'. Sorry buddy, but a 3 year age gap doesn't qualify as a pedophilia diagnosis and that right there is all you even need to know to make a informed decision. My statement is a statement regarding what happened, which stands true, but lets be real here about the reality of the situation. You can call it wrong at most, sure. But pedophilia or 'child loving'? No. So what exactly is there even to debunk about the pedophilia claim? Yall wanted a statement about what took place and you got one as promised, and you'd only be able to tie pedophilia to that offically by the book if I was 5 years older than the party or they were 13 or younger and unfortunatently for all those 'ice is a p word' people I have never dated someone who was 5 years younger than me and I've never dated someone who was 13 or younger and never will. Boohoo. Pedophilia isn't dating someone under 18, it's dating someone who is 5 years younger than you or someone who is or is younger than 13.

Don't ya think it's funny how in the orginal CW against me they never once made any mention of my age at the time? Anyone you ask probably wouldn't of even known how old I was and how can you even take something like that as creditable when they leave out small details like that would of made the world of difference. They couldn't stop pushing how old Clorox was and made that there for-front, but it's pretty humerous how my age was never even brought up or mentioned by the orginal authors at the time and they couldn't stop mentioning the age of the so called 'victum'. "Ice dated someone 3 years younger than him" wouldn't make a very good headline don't ya think? Wonder why my age was kept out of the CW.... Hm... Oh thats right! because if it was we wouldn't be here today talking about how 'ice is a p word who likes children' now would we? There's a reason why I said a lot of information was left out intentionally in the orginal CW and how it was a plot by enemies of mine to take me down. Information that would of made a complete difference in the authors claim was intentionally left out for a reason and here you are, and people like yourself, posting about how much I like kids on my threads when you didn't even bother to look deep into the CW and ask the kind of questions which should of really been asked. I'll admit though, creating the CW thread in the way he did and only including specific details in the CW was pretty smart on his part. Playing on the 'she is 16 and a victum' showing chat conversations and providing 0 context on them to play and count on your anger to piece things together for you rather than using your head. Sounds more and more like 'rigged/falsified evidence', because it left out important information / proof that would fire back against the authors argument, which just like I said, was intended to make a specific party look guilty aka 'rigged / left out information / false evidence' does it not? Sounds to me like the CW creator, a person who had motive to make me look bad considering he was fired by me from SirHurt's team, losing his pay, had plenty of motive to twist evidence and facts around to get revenge against me just like I had stated. He knew my proper age at the time, and yet, chose not to include it because it would of easily of made the P word claim debunked. Would you not call that evidence rigging?

@superleito1_1 If you disagree with my above reply then feel free to debunk it and prove me wrong. I don't see anything in your post that would prove I was older than 5 years of age or she was 13 or younger. I got a government issued document which proves what my age was at the time of the incident, proving I was under the 5 year age gap range. What's your evidence?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/pedophilia

• The person is at least 16 years old, and at least 5 years older than the child with whom the person engages in inapprorpirate behavior. This does not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old.

Got any evidence that would suggust I was 5 years older than her claimed age at the time of the incident? If you don't kindly get off my threads and stop posting misinformation. Remember everyone, if its not a 5+ year age gap, or the party is not 13 years or younger, it's not pedophilia, period. Please read the definition of the word before accusing someone of it.