Is the WRD API or BloxSploit API better?

First of all from when I tested BloxSploit api, it didnt work because it kept saying, "Already Injected" and it does the same with axon if I was to use it. WeAreDevs is easier to use most definetly becuase it has simple to use commands. BloxSploit api is the same but slow updates  and less commands also the only pro to BloxSploit api is that it is full lua.

Oh. Thanks for the information. I suppose I'll either continue using the WRD version for easier use and updates, or BloxSploit for adding commands such as RemoteSpy.

@07Lx

In my exploit I had decompiled both WeAreDevs and Bloxsploits APIs and managed to get them BOTH working.

This is based off WeAreDevs's side the cons of WeAreDevs are basically BloxSploit's API

WeAreDevs Pros :

1. Stability (WeAreDevs is more stable than BloxSploit's API in many ways.

2. Update timings (WeAreDevs updates faster than the Bloxsploit API)

3. Execution (WeAreDevs is #1 with execution as BloxSploit only was made in under 3 hours of development and the only updates are Roblox updates tbh so I highly recommend WeAreDevs on that part.)

WeAreDevs Cons :
1. Creating Exploits (WeAreDevs makes your exploit lag and responsible for almost every damage done inside of the API part of your software but BloxSploit API does not face this problem.)

2. Exploits In General (WeAreDevs lags depending on the scripts that you execute size and lines a lot, so BloxSploit's API doesn't lag. Well, BloxSploit's API just normally crashes if it's way too big in size/lines for the executor/cheat.)

3. Functions (WeAreDevs does not have support for scripts like get clipboard and stuff like that in Synapse X and BloxSploit only supports basic clipboard scripts.)  

NOTE: Please rep me as I spent months working on how these APIs are better/worse than each other and I also had to make really nice exploits based on the APIs in Visual Studio! 

Thanks for the information, sadly can't rep you because I got no VIP.