Texas' Moderation.

This isn't law school.

This is called "We Are Devs Forums Discussion Page" + going by your definition of "ranting" you hurt my feelings  and you mentioned me so I feel it was directed towards me :pepelaugh:

So that's just about the entirety of your counter-argument? "It doesn't matter if facts point otherwise, as long as the crowd agrees with me and all other opinions are silenced, we prevail" is quite the opposite of an ideology that's going to last long, especially when you previously implied that the moderators get to choose which opinions remain and which don't.

@Texas There is no counter argument, this is a discussion forum :pepelaugh:

@0x777_ I'm not sure what part of the discussion forum prevents there from being an argument. Pardellaalt made his statement, I disagree with it, therefore I've now started an argument with the purpose of refuting his original statement. Is the logic too hard for you to understand, or is it the complete inability of you to refute what I said forcing you to deny the existence of an argument?

@63456I mean hell man im just reading the rules you guys made I don't see "arguing" under the sub-forum rules do you? Naughty Naughty Texas

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/802769346753593354/828233204212826172/unknown.png

-2 and +2 reps are opinions, don't associate them with moderation unless the mods are warning them. The mods just want people to reply to the thread in the way the author intended to, you can add your own opinions, but in general, keep your opinions in discussion or in threads discussing them.

@ImmuneLion318 Axon isn't open source but the original programmers behind it don't care the slightest about it being used since it's so mediocre in comparison of what they make now.

@0x777_ Quite flawed logic, once again, replies are free to make. If by that specific thread replies were forbidden to be arguments, then no other forms of communication are ever specified. That would mean that replies discussing a subject, debating it, informing about it or absolutely any other form would be forbidden as well. It would lead into a loophole in which just about all replies would be removed.

But, in reality, no specific rules are ever made about the contents of replies, so as long as they are relevant to the thread at hand, they break no guidelines.

Remember  replied have to be  relavent to the thread :pepelaugh: arguing is not

@0x777_ Arguments and discussions can share the same topic, can they not? You are grasping to any loophole, and ironically failing to understand basic concepts of logic.

@Texas Right back at you sunshine you're failing to grasp the basic concept of relevance of replies. 

@0x777_ Yet you fail to refute my point on how discussions and arguments can have the same topic... How ironic. Relevance also directly describes the relation of a matter at hand between two differing sections of anything that exists. Which is why my argument is aimed towards the same topic that OP is posting about, just refuting it.

@63456Yet you fail to refute my point on how this is clearly called a discussion forum, not Texas` agruing forum... How ironic.

@0x777_ A point which you never stated. Discussion is the process of considering a subject, in which case that subject can either be discussed or argued about, as after all they are the same concept just one being positive and negative. Your "logic", or lack thereof, attempts to state that I ever considered discussion my "own personal grounds of arguing" (a claim which has no evidence or logic behind it), while ignoring the previous argument that you've made, attempting to state that the sub-forum rules here prohibit arguing because they don't specify it (in which case they don't specify any form of reply, and if that were the case then essentially all forms of communication apart from posting threads would be forbidden).