Texas' Moderation.

my view is they're just being better mods and i understand the -rep for replying saying not to use axon on a thread asking how to fix axon, but the fact the person immune called a skid was +repped is a bit weird.

@64220 he's seen it already lol

I feel like these Moderators are going to kill the WRD Community with their way of Moderation.

@eb_ I made 7 rep on v3rmillion out of one thread alone kekw

i give this thread a vouch

@stan2474_ best mod on wrd

@stan2474_ You, Funtimes, And Monkey Was My Favorite Mods

@stan2474_ friendly fire love u

its a real blast reading all the replies saying theyre killing the community when all theyre doing is cleaning the forums 

if you contribute nothing useful to the community i doubt they care if you leave 

if you seriously feel like you need to constantly communicate with eachother just do it somewhere else instead of crying that the forums are being ruined just because you cant post pointless and worthless garbage at every chance you get

++ not to mention that literally only one person in this entire thread has negative rep

why are you complaining about neg rep when yours is positive?

Flawed logic, bias against individuals and stupidity. The trifecta of the current problems here, all in the thread which you post to criticize the individuals attempting to resolve them.

The only argument made in your own thread's content is attempting to state that the reputation that is justified by the rules, agreed on by moderators and proved with witnesses and screenshots is useless.

You stating "telling someone to stop using axon and most of the community would agree to stop using axon" only proves my argument further, as it's not against the rules or any form of common sense. It is rather apart of your superiority complex and the eternal desire to base development off of individual experience and skill, while attempting to block out individuals from doing what they want.

Locust's hypocrisy is at the same level, in a previous thread he even complained how he all of those individuals got -rep for posting irrelevant replies to a thread and needlessly telling someone to learn CPP and to stop skidding, while the individual had his -rep countered, even though all he needed was a simple compiling error solution to his personal project.

Axon is not anything you can call open source now. Sure, open source means a system to encourage decentralized collaboration.

It would be quite illegal to use Axon's source code for any commercial product. But what you forget to acknowledge is that no law exists to prevent you from using copyrighted material for personal projects, which is what quite a lot of individuals aim to do.

As for Taxi and his "arguments", you have to stoop quite low to take 5 messages from the appeals channel and make conclusions that I was comparing myself to Adolf Hitler. All of the screenshots there were taken in the appeal channel after conclusions were made about your case, and all were in the context of HOI4 which you so eagerly cut out of all screenshots apart from one.

You dare accuse me of being corrupt, while offering no evidence to support any claim that I was ever deviating from any moderation procedures that were established in collaboration of the entire team. You also call me unprofessional, while you make this argument within the same appeal procedure:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/802083180323536947/828221127226425364/Discord_Sq8BTsqabO.png

By your beliefs, you choose what is valid and what is not, as well as what parts of an argument to add, cut out or straight up manipulate just so they fit into the picture. Within the argument you attempted to cherrypick what guidelines (old or new) conformed best to your argument, while disregarding any statements that refute that stupid idea.

You have a false sense of superiority, and a personality that is only aimed to attempt to exploit loopholes. Comparing one with Hitler and also calling me a neonazi is quite foolish on its own. The first screenshot you send is a highly-misleading and out of context screenshot in which I state "well people do get me mixed up with Hitler" which is as any sane person would tell you - very far from comparing myself to Hitler, it was also in the context of you baselessly calling me a dictator:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/802083180323536947/828222245578342440/Discord_ssufqt0xHI.png

The rest are taken out of context and were posted after the case was closed, and in the context that I was playing HOI4.

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/802083180323536947/828222703701196820/Discord_Lj17lCEFvg.png

You offer no arguments, you cloud your "evidence" by cropping it perfectly to hide all contexts and make individuals resort to making bad conclusions, then you call me a neonazi as if that was ever stated anywhere or proven by anything.

@Texas Theres no argument here, we're just discussing :pepelaugh:

@0x777_ Well if there's no argument then I've certainly started one, for the purpose of clearing up bias and misinformation.

Whether they ignore my points is none of my concern, after all arguments are useless unless the side that spectates is smart enough to make their own conclusions based on what each side offers.

@Texas so your just ranting then :bruh:

When one of your colleagues agrees with the situation theres not much more to discuss now isn't there :kek:

@0x777_ I believe you're making quite a few baseless conclusions. A rant would be something not directly aimed towards individuals, and more aimed towards feelings. Even if other moderators agree with me, that doesn't instantaneously stop the argument or win it in our favor, to think otherwise would have to mean that you have a false belief that we get to censor opinions or end uprisings just by our own authority.

If you for some reason consider my argument a rant just because I mentioned that their response is not necessary for me to get all facts lined up, then it's rather a flaw in your logic. This is a classic argument, if they respond - I refute. In the quite possible chance that they leave our arguments be to attempt to overshadow them, the conclusions are quite easy to make on not just our side, but the side which attempts to analyze the argument and make their own opinions of subjects.